police4aqi

Police, The Fourth Amendment, Qualified Immunity

Pet owners win dog shooting case in Ninth Circuit split decision

leave a comment »

Case: Thurston v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, No. 12-15729 (9th Circuit 2014, not for publication)

Quote:

As this court ruled in [a previous case], a reasonable officer “should have known that to create a plan to enter the perimeter of a person’s property, knowing all the while about the presence of dogs on the property, without considering a method of subduing the dogs besides killing them, would violate the Fourth Amendment.” . . . Thus, Thurston’s constitutional right was clearly established at the time of the shooting and the officers are not entitled to qualified immunity.

Comment: In this case, the officer’s got the occupants away from the house and then shot the dogs later. The dissent took this to mean that there was no way that the pet owners’ could contradict the police version of the events (whch was, predictably, that the dogs attacked them suddenly). However, the majority opinion was less trusting of the police and denied summary judgement (sj).

Written by Burgers Allday

January 19, 2014 at 11:25 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: