Police, The Fourth Amendment, Qualified Immunity

Interesting arrest-of-man-video’ing-police case

with one comment

Case: MAM v. CITY OF FULLERTON, Case No. 8:11-cv-1242-JST (MLGx) (C.D. California, March 12, 2013)

What happened: Man videotaped police making a violent arrest outside a bar at 2 am. One of the policeman pulled the videographer (that is, the plaintiff here) out of a small crowd and arrested him for obstruction after taking him to the ground with a leg sweep. Another person in the small crowd picked up the camera and kept taping while police were arresting plaintiff.

Decision: (i) there was probable cause for obstruction because videographer would not move back; (ii) there may be a good “First Amendment retaliation” claim because none of the crowd moved back, but only the guy wih the camera was arrested; and (iii) the leg sweep may have been excessive force.

Comment: I wonder how the police would have acted without the camera there. I believe this is the same police force that beat Kelly Thomas to death.

Written by Burgers Allday

March 16, 2013 at 12:03 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You are correct. The technical term is a a Murderous Criminal Syndicate.

    J.E. andreasen

    March 16, 2013 at 3:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: