Police, The Fourth Amendment, Qualified Immunity

LITTLETON v. SWONGER, No. 11-1800 (Fourth Circuit, December 28, 2012)

leave a comment »


An eyewitness contradicts, in certain importnt respects, Officer Swonger’s account of why he shot deceased (and unarmed) plaintiff to death. This contradiction prevents Officer Swonger from getting qi on summary judgement.

Written by Burgers Allday

December 31, 2012 at 8:55 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: